Hi Loïc, it’s nice to read you. For me, the actor and the observer are the question of acting and non-acting, the Chariot and the Hanged Man in the Tarot de Marseille. So maybe meditation isn't about trading the actor's seat for the spectator's. Maybe it's about sitting at the hub, the still, empty center that lets the wheel turn, and feeling the tension between the two without rushing to resolve it. Perhaps that's where the director lives ?
Hi Loïc, it’s nice to read you. For me, the actor and the observer are the question of acting and non-acting, the Chariot and the Hanged Man in the Tarot de Marseille. So maybe meditation isn't about trading the actor's seat for the spectator's. Maybe it's about sitting at the hub, the still, empty center that lets the wheel turn, and feeling the tension between the two without rushing to resolve it. Perhaps that's where the director lives ?
I like it thanks Charlotte!
I was who I am when I was young. Now I'm back :) blessings!
That's one very important question today, and it was asked 60 years ago by Guy Debord and most Situationists.
Current Attention-based business models can only turn people into "users", spectators, available brains who consume data toxic data.
That's the Internet of Information.
Fortunately, new Participation-based models are emerging, that leverage the power of collective intelligence and an Achievement-based economy.
That's the next era of the Internet, an Internet for Action.
From Information to Action, from spectators to actors.
Together